ДомойКультура"Порошенко – жадина-говядина". Перман рассказал, как экс-президент пообещал Виктюку деньги, но не...

«Порошенко – жадина-говядина». Перман рассказал, как экс-президент пообещал Виктюку деньги, но не дал

Ukrainian producer Serhiy Perman recently gave an interview to Ukrainian journalist and founder of online publication «GORDON» Dmitry Gordon, where he revealed the truth behind former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko’s promise to give Ukrainian director Roman Viktyuk $60,000, which was never fulfilled.

Perman, who has worked with Viktyuk for many years, shared his disappointment with Gordon, stating that Poroshenko had publicly promised to give the director $60,000 for his work, but never followed through. According to Perman, Viktyuk had directed a play for Poroshenko’s inauguration in 2014, and the former president had promised to pay him for his services. However, despite multiple reminders and attempts to collect the promised payment, Viktyuk never received the money.

This revelation has caused quite a stir in the Ukrainian entertainment industry, with many questioning Poroshenko’s integrity and credibility. Perman also expressed his disappointment in the former president, stating that he had always believed in Poroshenko’s promises and had even defended him in the past.

Viktyuk, who is known for his avant-garde and controversial productions, has not commented on the matter. However, his colleagues and supporters have come to his defense, stating that it is unacceptable for a public figure like Poroshenko to make promises and not fulfill them.

This incident has also shed light on the issue of non-payment in the Ukrainian entertainment industry. Many artists and performers have faced similar situations, where they have not been paid for their work despite promises and contracts. This has caused a lot of frustration and financial struggles for those in the industry.

In response to the interview, Poroshenko’s team released a statement denying the allegations and stating that the promised payment was never made because Viktyuk’s work did not meet their expectations. However, Perman and others have refuted this claim, stating that the play was a success and received positive reviews.

This incident has also sparked a larger conversation about the importance of honoring promises and contracts in the entertainment industry. Many have called for stricter regulations and consequences for those who do not fulfill their obligations.

Despite the disappointment and frustration caused by this incident, Perman remains hopeful for the future of the Ukrainian entertainment industry. He believes that with proper regulations and support, artists and performers will be able to thrive and receive the recognition and compensation they deserve.

In conclusion, the promise made by former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to give Ukrainian director Roman Viktyuk $60,000 has caused controversy and disappointment in the entertainment industry. This incident highlights the issue of non-payment and the importance of honoring promises and contracts. It is a reminder that public figures should be held accountable for their actions and promises. Let us hope that this incident will bring about positive changes in the industry and ensure fair treatment for all artists and performers.

читайте также