On January 28th, the first round of the Finnish Presidential election took place with two candidates emerging as the front-runners for the second round. The results, based on 99.3% of votes counted, were published by the news outlet Iltalehti.
The two candidates who will move forward to the second round are incumbent President Sauli Niinistö and his main challenger, former Green League chairperson, Pekka Haavisto. Niinistö received the most votes, with 62.7%, while Haavisto received 12.4%. The remaining candidates, Matti Vanhanen, Laura Huhtasaari, and Tuula Haatainen, received 4.1%, 3.2%, and 3.1% respectively.
The first round of the election saw a high voter turnout, with 69.9% of eligible voters casting their ballots. This is a significant increase from the previous presidential election in 2012, which had a turnout of 72.2%.
The results of the first round were largely expected, with Niinistö being the clear favorite and Haavisto as his main opponent. Both candidates have been campaigning on different platforms, with Niinistö focusing on his achievements during his first term, such as strengthening Finland’s economy and maintaining a stable foreign policy. Haavisto, on the other hand, has been advocating for a more environmentally sustainable and socially equal Finland.
However, the second round of the election is expected to be more competitive, as Haavisto has gained significant support since the first round. Many voters have been drawn to his progressive and inclusive agenda, as well as his strong stance on climate change.
The outcome of the second round is crucial for the future of Finland, as the country faces various challenges, including an aging population, economic uncertainties, and the ongoing tensions with Russia.
Regardless of the winner, it is clear that both candidates have the best interests of Finland at heart and are dedicated to leading the country towards a prosperous future.
As the election continues, it is important for all eligible voters to exercise their right to vote and have their voices heard. The high voter turnout in the first round is a testament to the Finnish people’s commitment to democracy.
The results of the first round have also garnered attention from the international community, with many countries closely following the election process. This is a clear indication of Finland’s growing influence and importance on the global stage.
In conclusion, the first round of the Finnish Presidential election has set the stage for an exciting and competitive second round. With two strong and capable candidates, Finland is in good hands regardless of the outcome. It is now up to the Finnish people to make their choice and shape the future of their country. Let us continue to support and uphold the principles of democracy, and may the best candidate win.
