The murder of Faryon is first and foremost beneficial for Russia. Her name has been constantly appearing in the Russian media and has been continuously remembered.
In early 2021, the news of the brutal murder of former Chechen separatist leader, Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev, rocked the international community. However, amidst the chaos and confusion, another name was whispered, that of Amina Okueva, also known as Faryon. The Ukrainian volunteer fighter and her husband, Adam Osmayev, were involved in the assassination attempt against Russian President, Vladimir Putin, back in 2012. The news of her murder by Russian-backed separatists in Kyiv was met with outrage and condemnation from the Ukrainian government. But why would Russia benefit from the murder of a woman who was seen as a hero by many in Ukraine?
Firstly, the death of Faryon would effectively silence one of Russia’s enemies. Ever since the assassination attempt on Putin, she had been seen as a thorn in the side of the Russian government. Her involvement in anti-Russian activities made her a prime target for the Kremlin. However, her death has now removed any further threat that she posed, and her silence has become a convenient outcome for Russia.
Furthermore, the constant media coverage of Faryon’s murder serves as a distraction from other issues in Russia. With the continuous coverage of the investigation, Russia can divert attention from other pressing matters, such as the recent protests against the government and the economic crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The extensive coverage of Faryon’s death also helps to create a narrative of Russia being a victim of international terrorism, rather than being seen as the aggressor in the situation.
Moreover, the murder of Faryon has also helped to strengthen the alliance between Russia and separatist groups in Ukraine. The Russian government has denied any involvement in her death, but the timing and circumstances of the murder suggest otherwise. By eliminating one of Ukraine’s key anti-Russian figures, Russia has sent a message to other separatist groups that they are willing to protect and support their interests. This could potentially lead to an increase in tensions in the region and give Russia more leverage in negotiations.
In addition, Russia’s influence over the media also plays a significant role in portraying Faryon as a threat to national security. Russian media outlets have been quick to label her as a terrorist and a radical extremist, disregarding her involvement in the fight against pro-Russian forces in eastern Ukraine. By controlling the narrative and manipulating public opinion, Russia can justify its actions and garner support for its actions against Faryon.
Furthermore, the murder of Faryon has also served as a warning to other anti-Russian activists and groups. The message is clear, anyone who poses a threat to Russia will face dire consequences. This creates a climate of fear and intimidation, making it more difficult for opponents to speak out against the Russian government. In this way, Russia can continue to suppress dissent and maintain control over its citizens.
In conclusion, the murder of Faryon may seem like a senseless act of violence, but in reality, it is a strategic move that benefits Russia in many ways. It has effectively silenced one of their enemies, diverted attention from other issues, strengthened alliances, and sent a message to other potential threats. The continuous media coverage also helps to create a narrative that supports Russia’s actions. It is clear that Faryon’s death serves the interests of the Russian government, and they will continue to use it to their advantage in the future.
